<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AIRE - The Appalachian Institute for Renewable Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aire-nc.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aire-nc.org</link>
	<description>A Community-Developed Renewable Energy Project on Every Roof</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The NC Sustainable Energy Association’s “Making Energy Work” Conference: NC A Leader In The Southeast’s Clean Energy Economy by Devan Riley</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/2011/11/17/ncsea-making-energy-work/comment-page-1/#comment-3527</link>
		<dc:creator>Devan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?p=2361#comment-3527</guid>
		<description>I believe that the NCSEA should get in contact with GreenSky Wind Systems. They are a sustainable energy company who installs estate/farm sustaining windmill systems. This windmills rotate on a vertical axis and provide energy to support an entire farm. 

Contact Quentin Ankri
Quentin.ankri@greensky-windsystems.com

www.greensky-windsystems.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the NCSEA should get in contact with GreenSky Wind Systems. They are a sustainable energy company who installs estate/farm sustaining windmill systems. This windmills rotate on a vertical axis and provide energy to support an entire farm. </p>
<p>Contact Quentin Ankri<br />
<a href="mailto:Quentin.ankri@greensky-windsystems.com">Quentin.ankri@greensky-windsystems.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.greensky-windsystems.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.greensky-windsystems.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Diane Rehm Discusses Solyndra and What&#8217;s Next for US Energy Policy by p marquet</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/2011/11/17/diane-rehm-show-talks-about-solyndra-and-whats-next-for-us-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>p marquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?p=2373#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>Solyndra technology remains intelligent, despite what&#039;s happening, dramatically convincing. I&#039;am terribly desappointed and hope at least the technology will survive this circumstancial, political defeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solyndra technology remains intelligent, despite what&#8217;s happening, dramatically convincing. I&#8217;am terribly desappointed and hope at least the technology will survive this circumstancial, political defeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fannie and Freddie to clean-energy program: Drop dead by Jill Langous</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/2010/07/07/fannie-and-freddie-to-clean-energy-program-drop-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Langous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 02:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?p=1558#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>Greetings from Melbourne. Thanks for the useful info. I&#039;m doing a project at uni and your content was quite useful. Thanks for sharing :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings from Melbourne. Thanks for the useful info. I&#8217;m doing a project at uni and your content was quite useful. Thanks for sharing <img src='http://aire-nc.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wise Energy Forum Resources by Mountain Justice Blacksburg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wise Energy Forum</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/wise/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain Justice Blacksburg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wise Energy Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?page_id=1368#comment-381</guid>
		<description>[...] The important work from the Forums is getting out into cyberspace and the airwaves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The important work from the Forums is getting out into cyberspace and the airwaves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Washington Post &#8211; On the Trail of Community-Owned Renewable Energy by Asheville Hardy</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/2009/11/15/the-washington-post-on-the-trail-of-community-owned-renewable-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Asheville Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?p=1354#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Community wind projects can include industrial scale wind turbines.  It is important to note this.  And this could include an industrial scale wind plant that is not allowed per the current SB-1068.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Community wind projects can include industrial scale wind turbines.  It is important to note this.  And this could include an industrial scale wind plant that is not allowed per the current SB-1068.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lets Refine the Debate: AIRE&#8217;s view on wind by Asheville Hardy</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/2009/07/20/lets-refine-the-debate-aires-view-on-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Asheville Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?p=878#comment-365</guid>
		<description>I think you need to point out to posters that you moderate the comments here....you remove any comments that might sway people against your political agenda.  You have removed all issues regarding the concerns of illness and wind turbines.  Please see my work in the Asheville paper.  Thanks!

I think removing comments about Acciona and the problems that one family is dealing with in regards to living next to turbines with their autistic son shows how desperate you are and it shows your inability to have truth as the core of your agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to point out to posters that you moderate the comments here&#8230;.you remove any comments that might sway people against your political agenda.  You have removed all issues regarding the concerns of illness and wind turbines.  Please see my work in the Asheville paper.  Thanks!</p>
<p>I think removing comments about Acciona and the problems that one family is dealing with in regards to living next to turbines with their autistic son shows how desperate you are and it shows your inability to have truth as the core of your agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lets Refine the Debate: AIRE&#8217;s view on wind by Asheville Hardy</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/2009/07/20/lets-refine-the-debate-aires-view-on-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Asheville Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?p=878#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Brent, another presenter at the wind forum that I appreciated was Paul Quinlin, as he spoke about the 1983 Mountain Ridge Protection Act and he stated that the definition of windmill has not been tested in a court of law.  Lawyers can give their opinions, people who were there can give their opinions, but he is 100% right as it has not been tested.  This test will be coming soon, and it will be interesting.  

Again, I appreciated what Paul Quinlin said.  He gave a very &quot;fair&quot; presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent, another presenter at the wind forum that I appreciated was Paul Quinlin, as he spoke about the 1983 Mountain Ridge Protection Act and he stated that the definition of windmill has not been tested in a court of law.  Lawyers can give their opinions, people who were there can give their opinions, but he is 100% right as it has not been tested.  This test will be coming soon, and it will be interesting.  </p>
<p>Again, I appreciated what Paul Quinlin said.  He gave a very &#8220;fair&#8221; presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lets Refine the Debate: AIRE&#8217;s view on wind by Asheville Hardy</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/2009/07/20/lets-refine-the-debate-aires-view-on-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Asheville Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?p=878#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Quint David, so if you believe that people should do what they want with their land, then what about a land owner with 800 acres near the NC/TN line that has a  coal seam.  Do you tell them that they have no right to sell the coal?  It is reported that one county in the mountains has recently discovered another fossil fuel.  I am trying to verify this.  This would lead to another type of plant being built in that county (not coal related).   So everyone should be treated the same in your opinion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quint David, so if you believe that people should do what they want with their land, then what about a land owner with 800 acres near the NC/TN line that has a  coal seam.  Do you tell them that they have no right to sell the coal?  It is reported that one county in the mountains has recently discovered another fossil fuel.  I am trying to verify this.  This would lead to another type of plant being built in that county (not coal related).   So everyone should be treated the same in your opinion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lets Refine the Debate: AIRE&#8217;s view on wind by Brent Summerville</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/2009/07/20/lets-refine-the-debate-aires-view-on-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Summerville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?p=878#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Remember, the decision is not wind energy or no wind energy, we are hopefully beyond that. The question is how to responsibly develop wind energy. Wisconsin just signed a wind permitting bill into law. NC is trying, but folks just don&#039;t get it for some reason.

[Wisconsin] Governor signs wind farm siting bill

Gov. Jim Doyle said Wednesday his signing of a wind farm siting bill should serve as a call to wind developers who have been avoiding building projects in the state. 

Jeff Anthony of the American Wind Energy Association said the bill was a needed step to attract the wind industry to the state. &quot;It restores common sense and consistency to wind project siting in Wisconsin,&quot; he said. &quot;Wind project developers will now view Wisconsin as a viable place for considering wind power development.&quot;

Read more at: http://www.jsonline.com/business/63007347.html

By the way, they have a nice little anti-wind group up there too, www.windcows.com. They still think wind turbines make you sick :-(

Cheers, Brent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, the decision is not wind energy or no wind energy, we are hopefully beyond that. The question is how to responsibly develop wind energy. Wisconsin just signed a wind permitting bill into law. NC is trying, but folks just don&#8217;t get it for some reason.</p>
<p>[Wisconsin] Governor signs wind farm siting bill</p>
<p>Gov. Jim Doyle said Wednesday his signing of a wind farm siting bill should serve as a call to wind developers who have been avoiding building projects in the state. </p>
<p>Jeff Anthony of the American Wind Energy Association said the bill was a needed step to attract the wind industry to the state. &#8220;It restores common sense and consistency to wind project siting in Wisconsin,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Wind project developers will now view Wisconsin as a viable place for considering wind power development.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more at: <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/business/63007347.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jsonline.com/business/63007347.html</a></p>
<p>By the way, they have a nice little anti-wind group up there too, <a href="http://www.windcows.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.windcows.com</a>. They still think wind turbines make you sick <img src='http://aire-nc.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers, Brent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Going Backwards! Senators ban wind in WNC by charlie humes</title>
		<link>http://aire-nc.org/2009/07/14/going-backwards-senators-ban-wind-in-wnc/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie humes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aire-nc.org/?p=801#comment-284</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand how I was putting anyone down Ann.  I think it&#039;s ridiculous that we&#039;ve reduced our ability to allow for sustainable energy technologies while still allowing electricity that causes asthma and pollutes our streams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand how I was putting anyone down Ann.  I think it&#8217;s ridiculous that we&#8217;ve reduced our ability to allow for sustainable energy technologies while still allowing electricity that causes asthma and pollutes our streams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

